[J5D]≫ Descargar Free NinetyNine Glimpses of Princess Margaret Craig Brown 9780374906047 Books

NinetyNine Glimpses of Princess Margaret Craig Brown 9780374906047 Books

Download As PDF : NinetyNine Glimpses of Princess Margaret Craig Brown 9780374906047 Books

NinetyNine Glimpses of Princess Margaret Craig Brown 9780374906047 Books

I have read dozens of biographies of British and Continental royal personages. This biography of Princess Margaret is certainly the most unusual royal biography I have read. I think it is also the most amusing and entertaining. Most royal biographies, especially authorized ones, are hagiographies. Examples of this genre are William Shawcross’s “The Queen Mother” (2009) and Pope-Hennessy’s “Queen Mary” (1959).

Craig Brown in writing this biography of Princess Margaret has broken with tradition in two mains respects. The book is the most irreverent royal biography I have read. It is the very antithesis of a hagiography. He has also created a new and possibly unique biographical style. Instead of the usual cradle to grave narrative, the reader is presented with ninety-nine glimpses from Princess Margaret’s life. Most are glimpses of her at unimportant social events that tend to highlight her moody, capricious, inconsiderate and often haughty behavior.

Although the book is highly readable and entertaining one must wonder whether it can really qualify as a biography at all. Although I understand the author’s boredom with conventional biographies, royal and otherwise, I think the presentation of this book deprives it of any historical significance. A reader unfamiliar with the story of Princess Margaret would be left with a very incomplete picture of her indeed. Where, for example, is Princess Margaret as a mother?

The Princess had two children with Anthony Armstrong-Jones, later Lord Snowdon. They are Viscount Linley and Lady Sarah Chatto and she also had three grandchildren. Yet there are hardly any references to them in this book and there is no description of the relationship Princess Margaret had with them. The only reference to Viscount Linley is in connection with the auction of his mother’s large collection of jewelry and other possessions after her death in which he is portrayed as a rather cold-blooded individual who did not hesitate to try to sell at auction even her 1957 portrait by Annigoni and was forced to buy it back from the auction house only after pressure was brought to bear by his father and sister.

We learn virtually nothing of Princess Margaret’s relationship with her sister, Queen Elizabeth II. Although Princess Margaret had a phone on her desk with a direct line to the Queen’s apartments at Buckingham Palace and although the two apparently chatted by phone almost every morning, few details of what was by all accounts a very loving relationship are portrayed.

More details are provided about the relationship between Princess Margaret and her mother, Queen Elizabeth, the Queen Mother. They at one time both resided at Clarence House on different floors and communicated by letters delivered from one to the other by liveried footmen. The author describes some interactions between the pair that suggest that Princess Margaret’s treatment of her mother was often disrespectful and even cruel, but the Queen Mother seems to have accepted all the slights and insults from her daughter with the grace and dignity she always displayed.

Towards the end of the book the author indulges in “what ifs.” He places emphasis on what if Princess Margaret had been the first-born child of King George VI and Queen Elizabeth, the current Queen, had been the second child. He suggests quite correctly I believe that Princess Margaret could never have carried off the royal job with the immense dignity and devotion of Queen Elizabeth II. However, this does not take into consideration the fact that the Queen was raised with the idea that she might one day inherit the throne, particularly after King Edward VIII’s abdication, and Princess Margaret was left to fulfill a secondary role.

A more important “what if” is I think would Princess Margaret have been a different person if her marriage to her first love Group Captain Peter Townsend had not been prevented by the British establishment? The answer to that question cannot possibly ever be known. Would she have grown bored with him or would she have settled into a comfortable and conventional royal life since the Group Captain had been a favorite of George VI and was well acquainted with royalty and royal protocol? My sense is that Princess Margaret was left embittered by being deprived of an opportunity for a happy married life and that all her undesirable characteristics that the author shows such delight in portraying were the result of that early bad experience.

The author points out that perhaps Princess Margaret’s most prominent characteristic was her unshakeable sense of being fully royal. She delighted in her title “Her Royal Highness, the Princess Margaret” and would often rebuke even close friends who failed to treat her with due deference. At dinner parties and functions of various types she would often use as an icebreaker the fact that she was the only person in the realm who could claim to be both the daughter of a King and the sister of a Queen.

The question that arises though is can her sense of being royal be regarded as a defect? Today even among the British people there seems to be a desire that members of the Royal family be just like them and have the common touch. This explains the enormous popularity of Prince Harry who likes to be just one of the boys and has entered a marriage that among old established royalty would be unthinkable. However, what is the purpose of Royalty if they are going to be just like everyone else?

The author takes a malicious delight throughout this book in pointing to Princess Margaret’s often bad behavior. It is true that Princess Margaret liked the arts and bohemia and therefore would often socialize with a rather raffish crowd. Therefore, she wanted to both have her royal cake and eat it. The author also tends to poke fun at the Princess’s appearance drawing attention to the fact that some called her “The Royal Dwarf” because of her small stature. However, the illustrations provided, except those towards the later part of her life, show a truly beautiful woman superbly dressed and coiffed and with a wonderful smile. I saw Princess Margaret once when she came to open a Clinic at a hospital where I worked, and she was the very epitome of what one might consider a Royal personage.

In conclusion, I found this book tremendously interesting and entertaining. However, reading it for me was a kind of guilty pleasure. I think the author has been somewhat unfair to Princess Margaret and the definitive biography of her remains to be written. She deserves more credit than she gets in this amusingly malicious book.


Tags : Ninety-Nine Glimpses of Princess Margaret [Craig Brown] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. <b>“Rollicking, irresistible, un-put-downable . . . For anyone . . . who swooned to Netflix’s The Crown</i>,Craig Brown,Ninety-Nine Glimpses of Princess Margaret,Farrar, Straus and Giroux,0374906041,Biographies,Margaret,Princesses - Great Britain,Princesses;Great Britain;Biography.,010101 FSG Cloth,BIOGRAPHY & AUTOBIOGRAPHY Rich & Famous,BIOGRAPHY & AUTOBIOGRAPHY Royalty,BIOGRAPHY AND AUTOBIOGRAPHY,Biography,Biography & AutobiographyRich & Famous,BiographyAutobiography,GENERAL,GREAT BRITAIN - HISTORY - 20TH CENTURY,General Adult,Great BritainBritish Isles,Non-Fiction,Rich & Famous,United States,royal biography; royal biographies; British royalty; biographies about royalty; royalty biography; books about royalty; monarch biography; biography monarch; British monarchy; England; English history; British nobility; royal family; high society; jazz; 1950s; pop culture; washington post best books of the year; best books of 2018; new york times notable books of the year; npr best books of the year; Oregonian best books of the year; seattle times best books of the year

NinetyNine Glimpses of Princess Margaret Craig Brown 9780374906047 Books Reviews

Being the Queen's younger sister isn't all it's cracked up to be. Often Princess Margaret was elegant, vivacious, and entertaining in a way her dutiful older sister could never be, but at other times she could be boring, snobby, and insufferable. Craig Brown has produced an account which is as mercurial as the Princess herself often fascinating and hilarious, but at other times stuffy and frankly, tedious.

This is not a standard biography but a series of 99 short chapters or vignettes, arranged in roughly chronological order, designed to shed some daylight on the Princess' life. Some are obviously fiction, like the description of her marriage to Pablo Picasso or the 1977 Christmas speech from "Queen Margaret I." Others are drawn from more traditional biographies of the Princess or her family members, and still others are obviously based on gossip passed from person to person within the Princess' circle of friends and acquaintances. There's a lot of repetition it grew wearisome to read through all the nasty jokes the Princess' husband Lord Snowdon used to play on her, and I really don't see the point of summarizing obituaries or of a detailed list of every single item sold off by the Princess' children after her death in 2002, or indeed of reprinting advertisements listing the amenities of the Princess' former vacation spot on Mustique. But perhaps that was Brown's point that Princess Margaret, despite being an intelligent and often witty woman, led an empty and tedious life.
What will one do if one realises her life apexed at the age of six? This is a great account of what one woman did with hers. Riveting and witty.
Fun and easy to read, with lots of good stuff. However, the book leaves you without a clear understanding of the Princess herself; on what made her tick, and just focusing as it does on the gossip of others.This leaves you with a lop-sided picture of the person...somewhat unfair, I thought. Interesting but bit disappointing overall.
I'm fascinated, but not surprised, by the almost equal 5 star and 1 star reviews and it's really a love-it-or-hate it read. If you want a gushing, respectful Royal biography pass this book up - however - if you want a rollicking, very very funny, appalling and no-holds-barred peek into Royal privilege and the sycophants who lust after it - well - this is the book for you. The best parts are the diary excerpts from Princess Margaret's many frenemies, who evidently put up with her antics solely to be able to document her extraordinary and ultimately self-destructive behavior. I thoroughly enjoyed this book.
a one off as the English might say, Princess Margaret lived a life, mostly a lonely life, although unrequited love from Pablo Picasso came as a bit of a surprise. Although interred at St George's Windsor, interesting to note she was cremated in a public facility in Slough between Oxford and London and mostly known for being the hometown of the actress Tracey Ullman. That said, she was blunt and probably not intended to assist but as Her Majesty herself said, I'm used to it. She married badly with Tony Snapshot, Sir Antony Armstrong Jones or Tony as she refers to him but they had two lovely children, the furniture maker Viscount Linley and Lady Sarah Chatto whose son Arthur Chatto is the latest royal heartthrob. A sad figure, the Queen felt sorry for her younger sister. The best anecdote, however, is not in the book when she says to Elton John that Bennie and the Jets was the most atonal song ever written, apparently Sir Elton agreed. In the end, the truth hurts.
Scandalous yes! The author spares no punch when describing the antics of Princess Margaret. A difficult women for sure, perhaps made more impossible by her position in the royal family. At times the author makes you laugh, and at other times you feel sorry for Margaret. The pains and joys of living a privileged and painful life.
I have read dozens of biographies of British and Continental royal personages. This biography of Princess Margaret is certainly the most unusual royal biography I have read. I think it is also the most amusing and entertaining. Most royal biographies, especially authorized ones, are hagiographies. Examples of this genre are William Shawcross’s “The Queen Mother” (2009) and Pope-Hennessy’s “Queen Mary” (1959).

Craig Brown in writing this biography of Princess Margaret has broken with tradition in two mains respects. The book is the most irreverent royal biography I have read. It is the very antithesis of a hagiography. He has also created a new and possibly unique biographical style. Instead of the usual cradle to grave narrative, the reader is presented with ninety-nine glimpses from Princess Margaret’s life. Most are glimpses of her at unimportant social events that tend to highlight her moody, capricious, inconsiderate and often haughty behavior.

Although the book is highly readable and entertaining one must wonder whether it can really qualify as a biography at all. Although I understand the author’s boredom with conventional biographies, royal and otherwise, I think the presentation of this book deprives it of any historical significance. A reader unfamiliar with the story of Princess Margaret would be left with a very incomplete picture of her indeed. Where, for example, is Princess Margaret as a mother?

The Princess had two children with Anthony Armstrong-Jones, later Lord Snowdon. They are Viscount Linley and Lady Sarah Chatto and she also had three grandchildren. Yet there are hardly any references to them in this book and there is no description of the relationship Princess Margaret had with them. The only reference to Viscount Linley is in connection with the auction of his mother’s large collection of jewelry and other possessions after her death in which he is portrayed as a rather cold-blooded individual who did not hesitate to try to sell at auction even her 1957 portrait by Annigoni and was forced to buy it back from the auction house only after pressure was brought to bear by his father and sister.

We learn virtually nothing of Princess Margaret’s relationship with her sister, Queen Elizabeth II. Although Princess Margaret had a phone on her desk with a direct line to the Queen’s apartments at Buckingham Palace and although the two apparently chatted by phone almost every morning, few details of what was by all accounts a very loving relationship are portrayed.

More details are provided about the relationship between Princess Margaret and her mother, Queen Elizabeth, the Queen Mother. They at one time both resided at Clarence House on different floors and communicated by letters delivered from one to the other by liveried footmen. The author describes some interactions between the pair that suggest that Princess Margaret’s treatment of her mother was often disrespectful and even cruel, but the Queen Mother seems to have accepted all the slights and insults from her daughter with the grace and dignity she always displayed.

Towards the end of the book the author indulges in “what ifs.” He places emphasis on what if Princess Margaret had been the first-born child of King George VI and Queen Elizabeth, the current Queen, had been the second child. He suggests quite correctly I believe that Princess Margaret could never have carried off the royal job with the immense dignity and devotion of Queen Elizabeth II. However, this does not take into consideration the fact that the Queen was raised with the idea that she might one day inherit the throne, particularly after King Edward VIII’s abdication, and Princess Margaret was left to fulfill a secondary role.

A more important “what if” is I think would Princess Margaret have been a different person if her marriage to her first love Group Captain Peter Townsend had not been prevented by the British establishment? The answer to that question cannot possibly ever be known. Would she have grown bored with him or would she have settled into a comfortable and conventional royal life since the Group Captain had been a favorite of George VI and was well acquainted with royalty and royal protocol? My sense is that Princess Margaret was left embittered by being deprived of an opportunity for a happy married life and that all her undesirable characteristics that the author shows such delight in portraying were the result of that early bad experience.

The author points out that perhaps Princess Margaret’s most prominent characteristic was her unshakeable sense of being fully royal. She delighted in her title “Her Royal Highness, the Princess Margaret” and would often rebuke even close friends who failed to treat her with due deference. At dinner parties and functions of various types she would often use as an icebreaker the fact that she was the only person in the realm who could claim to be both the daughter of a King and the sister of a Queen.

The question that arises though is can her sense of being royal be regarded as a defect? Today even among the British people there seems to be a desire that members of the Royal family be just like them and have the common touch. This explains the enormous popularity of Prince Harry who likes to be just one of the boys and has entered a marriage that among old established royalty would be unthinkable. However, what is the purpose of Royalty if they are going to be just like everyone else?

The author takes a malicious delight throughout this book in pointing to Princess Margaret’s often bad behavior. It is true that Princess Margaret liked the arts and bohemia and therefore would often socialize with a rather raffish crowd. Therefore, she wanted to both have her royal cake and eat it. The author also tends to poke fun at the Princess’s appearance drawing attention to the fact that some called her “The Royal Dwarf” because of her small stature. However, the illustrations provided, except those towards the later part of her life, show a truly beautiful woman superbly dressed and coiffed and with a wonderful smile. I saw Princess Margaret once when she came to open a Clinic at a hospital where I worked, and she was the very epitome of what one might consider a Royal personage.

In conclusion, I found this book tremendously interesting and entertaining. However, reading it for me was a kind of guilty pleasure. I think the author has been somewhat unfair to Princess Margaret and the definitive biography of her remains to be written. She deserves more credit than she gets in this amusingly malicious book.